French Tarrasch - French Defense Variation
French Tarrasch
Definition
The French Tarrasch is a major branch of the French Defence that arises after the moves 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2. It is named after the great German theoretician Siegbert Tarrasch (1862-1934), who championed this way of meeting the French at the turn of the 20th century. By placing the knight on d2 instead of the more aggressive c3, White sidesteps the Winawer pin (…Bb4) and keeps the c-pawn free to support the center with c2-c3 or to strike later with c2-c4.
Typical Move Order
After 3. Nd2, Black has three principal replies:
- 3…Nf6 (–> Main Line) – The most popular and theoretically critical.
- 3…c5 (–> Rubinstein Variation) – An immediate challenge to the center, often leading to IQP structures.
- 3…Be7 (–> Guimard Variation) – A flexible system that keeps options open for Black.
The main-line French Tarrasch continues 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6, reaching one of the most important tabiyas of French theory.
Strategic Ideas
-
For White
- Maintain a solid pawn chain (e5–d4–c3) and restrict Black’s light-squared bishop.
- Prepare the pawn break f2-f4 (sometimes preceded by Ng1-f3-g5) to generate a kingside attack.
- Exploit space advantage and the possibility of a future c3-c4 break to gain queenside territory.
-
For Black
- Pressure the d4-pawn with …c5 and …Nc6; sometimes capture on d4 to produce an isolated d-pawn for White.
- Use the semi-open f-file after …f7-f6 to undermine White’s center (especially in endgames).
- Develop the light-squared bishop via …b6 and …Ba6 or …Bb7, targeting e2/e5.
Historical Context
Tarrasch employed 3. Nd2 as early as 1893, advocating its “healthy” structure and harmonious piece play. The variation experienced surges of popularity whenever players sought a positional alternative to the sharper 3. Nc3 lines. It was a key weapon for world-class grandmasters such as Anatoly Karpov, Ulf Andersson, Gata Kamsky, Peter Leko, and more recently Wesley So and Anish Giri.
Illustrative Game
The following miniature shows White’s thematic kingside expansion.
After 8…fxe5 9. dxe5 Ndxe5 10. Bb1 Bc5 11. 0-0, White enjoyed a pleasant space advantage and eventually won (Petrosian–Benko, Moscow 1959).
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
-
Siegbert Tarrasch believed the move 3. Nd2 to be
the most natural continuation, preventing Black from obtaining his beloved pin with …Bb4
. Ironically, modern engines view 3. Nc3 as slightly more ambitious, yet 3. Nd2 remains one of the toughest practical tests of the French. - In the 1996 Candidates match Kamsky–Short, every game with 1. e4 e6 saw Short choose the Rubinstein (3…c5) rather than face Kamsky’s meticulous preparation in the main-line Tarrasch.
-
Because the d-knight must sometimes retreat to b1 after …cxd4,
French-Tarrasch players humorously claim their
knight gets more exercise than any other piece on the board
.
When to Use It
Choose the French Tarrasch if you prefer:
- A solid, strategically rich struggle without the heavy theory of the Winawer or Poisoned Pawn.
- Good chances to steer the game into positional channels where maneuvering skill is rewarded.
- Flexibility to play for a kingside attack (f-pawn storms) or a queenside space grab with c3-c4.
Key Takeaways
- 3. Nd2 dodges the Winawer and keeps the center robust.
- The critical battlegrounds are the d4-pawn, the e5-stronghold, and timely pawn breaks (f2-f4, …f6, c3-c4).
- Both sides must harmonize piece placement: White’s dark-squared bishop often aims at g6 or b5, while Black’s light-squared bishop searches for an active diagonal.
- Endgames frequently revolve around minority attacks and pawn-structure nuances, making strategic planning paramount.